DoJ defends Microsoft settlement

Justice Department hopes to gain federal endorsement

Written by John Geralds in Silicon Valley

The US Department of Justice (DoJ) defended the terms of its antitrust settlement with Microsoft to a federal judge in the hope of gaining an endorsement.

The move was made despite objections from the nine states seeking harsher sanctions against the company.

Advertisement

DoJ attorney Philip Beck told US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly that a federal appeals court fundamentally narrowed the scope of Microsoft's wrongdoing, which made it difficult for the government to seek stronger penalties.

"Getting more would have been an uphill battle that was likely to have been resolved against us," said Beck. "We tried very hard the first time around and we were not able to do it."

Meanwhile, Microsoft lawyer John Warden said that the company accepted a settlement that "not only addresses the acts identified by the courts as illegal, but is far broader".

He explained that additional provisions, such as disclosing software code to link computers that run corporate networks with handheld devices, were accepted as "the price of the settlement".

Warden claimed that the settlement was in the best interests of all involved, and said it would reduce costs and strains on Microsoft in ending the four-year case.

Judge Kollar-Kotelly asked the government to clarify several elements of the settlement which she said were vague, and questioned whether all the proper disclosures had been made to the court.

The judge, who is holding two days of hearings on the proposed settlement, stated that it was not likely that she would make a ruling in the immediate future. "I have a lot of work ahead of me before I make this decision," she said.

As they now stand, the settlement terms prevent Microsoft from retaliating against computer makers for using non-Microsoft products, and insist on a uniform licence price for Windows.

The settlement also requires the company to disclose the inner workings of some of its software to third-party software makers, and makes it easier for consumers to remove some Windows features, such as the Internet Explorer browser.

Microsoft reached the settlement deal with the DoJ in November when nine of the 18 states in the lawsuit agreed to the conditions.

Tags:

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Do you agree?

IT white papers

Search vnunet IThound

Top categories

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Watch

Shaun Nichols and Iain Thomson

03 Oct 2008

6.49 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Podcast image

02 Oct 2008

14.35 MBComputing podcast - Next-generation broadband Britain; and we report from Gartner's IT security summit More...

Shaun Nichols and Iain Thomson

26 Sep 2008

3.43 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Poll

Google Android

Google Android

Are you intending to try out a Google Android mobile phone?

Previous poll results

Spotlight

MoD building

Latest data breach leads MPs to demand culture change

MoD admits to losing a hard drive containing up to...  More...

Online shopping

E-retailers urged to prepare for Christmas

Credit crunch sending shoppers online for cheaper presents   More...

Mobile phone

Emerging markets drive mobile growth

Mobile penetration rates expected to reach 95 per cent by...  More...

Digital information

Poor data classification costing companies dear

Millions wasted on searching through clutter, says analyst   More...

Primary Navigation