Google
will face challenges with its acquisition of
YouTube,
according to analysts.
Gartner believes that the purchase presents Google with an opportunity to
tap the advertising market of a lucrative video brand, but copyright hurdles
must be cleared before that can happen.
A significant amount of content on YouTube includes copyrighted material,
often lifted from broadcast TV, DVDs and CDs.
Brand advertisers, in the main, are unwilling to place their adverts
alongside stolen or controversial material, according to Gartner.
YouTube claims to be introducing technology that identifies copyrighted
material, but such efforts have been largely unsuccessful, marred by false
positives and significant errors that go unmissed.
YouTube and Google face the burden of proving to advertisers that they will
be able to resolve this issue without alienating their audience.
Gartner also believes that Google's integration strategy for YouTube is
unclear. The search giant says that YouTube will remain independent, but it
believes that YouTube videos are likely to play a prominent role in
Google
Video's search results.
YouTube already has business relationships with rich-media search providers,
such as
Blinkx, to
which they provide a regular content feed, so Google will need to innovate
aggressively if it seeks to differentiate its use of YouTube's content in its
video search.
Finally, YouTube's business relationships with media companies, including
Warner
Music, NBC,
CBS,
Sony BMG
and
Universal
Music, provide a tantalising opportunity for Google to extend its core
AdSense
network into premium video content of very high value to advertisers.
This may well have been the primary motivation behind the deal, according to
Gartner. Before Google and YouTube can achieve the payout, they must prove that
they have a cure for the copyright problem.
Gartner urges technology providers developing copyright detection and
protection technology to focus on speed-to-market and scalable integration with
human-supported operations.
Premium content providers and advertisers should wait until Google and
YouTube can truly provide a safe venue for advertisers and premium content
without compromising the site's attractiveness.
The two companies have not cornered the market on consumer video partners.
Video
Egg,
Revver,
vSocial
and
Reality
Digital, among others, not only offer the same functions and services as
YouTube, but provide so-called 'white label' application service provider
solutions for networks and studios that wish to retain their brand name in
future online video services.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article