To judge the various strengths and weaknesses of each printer, we put them
through a series of different tests.
To assess print speed, we timed the printers’ output performance when
printing plain text, Pdfs, mixed content pages and photographs in both A4 and
6x4in sizes.
We also ran tests using virtually blank pages, to measure the absolute
maximum performance possible from the print engines.
In each test, we selected the highest quality setting possible, the default
setting and then the fastest mode available. All A4 tests, with the exception of
the photograph, were printed on standard plain paper.
All photographic tests were carried out using the best quality branded photo
paper supplied by each vendor. Again, we chose the highest quality print mode,
followed by default settings and then a fast mode if available.
To evaluate print quality, we used samples from the above tests printed at
various quality settings as well as images taken from Kodak’s Color Management
Check-Up Kit. This kit contains colour-managed images along with reference
prints that can be compared with the printers’ output to judge overall colour
accuracy.
In terms of print quality, there’s very little to distinguish these three
printers. All of them produced excellent results, although none of them produced
exact matches to our reference prints.
Differences in colour output are largely down to taste: All three printers
will deliver a good-looking image from a mediocre photo and we found that in
this respect they generally do a very good job.
This article is part of a
group
test of A4 photo printers
See also
Canon Pixma IP6700D
Epson Stylus Photo R360
HP Photosmart D7360
Photo printing under Windows Vista
Graphs and table of features can be read via our pdf downloads above
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article