Trojan vendor dishes the Dirt

Codex Data Systems, marketers of the controversial Dirt Trojan, has rubbished claims that the product does not actually exist. Eddie James, vice president of Codex, told vnunet.com: "Dirt has been available since 1998. It is in use by a number of law enforcement agencies."

Written by James Middleton

Codex Data Systems, marketers of the controversial Dirt Trojan, has rubbished claims that the product does not actually exist. Eddie James, vice president of Codex, told vnunet.com: "Dirt has been available since 1998. It is in use by a number of law enforcement agencies."

James also claimed that organisations such as Nato and the Hi-tech Crime Investigators Association have expressed interest in the product.

Advertisement

"The only reason it is of interest now is because someone got hold of a marketing presentation that was not for public disclosure. In fact, the product's existence was not meant to be public knowledge," he said, adding that "if we find that person we will file a criminal complaint through the Secret Service".

James said that he would "love to demonstrate the tool", but since vnunet.com is not an officially recognised law enforcement agency, he could not.

The reputation of Codex has been called into question after it was revealed by UK news website theregister that company chief executive Frank Jones is a convicted felon and known fraudster currently on probation for illegal possession of surveillance devices.

James was forced to acknowledge that the only reason Dirt is undetectable by antivirus software is because no antivirus company has ever seen it, and that it could only be used as a "last resort" tool after obtaining a court order.

As for the ability to bypass firewalls, done by killing the process in the operating system, there is no explanation as to how it attacks the firewall in the first place.

However, Paul Rogers, network security analyst at MIS, who has met the company, said he was very impressed with the standard of keyloggers Codex offered, but as he had not seen Dirt in action, he remained sceptical.

The rumours have also been fuelled by newsgroup postings from people claiming to have seen demonstrations of Dirt. One such posting on the Cypherpunk Hyperarchive said that Dirt it is "not much more than BackOrifice, NetBus, VNC or PC Anywhere, for that matter".

"It has a bit more capability than some of those, in that it will act as something similar to an FTP server and a keystroke capture tool. But any programmer with 2nd year C programming and a Win32 compiler can download VNC and add stuff to it to do the same thing," it added.

Tags:

Related articles

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Do you agree?

IT white papers

Search vnunet IThound

Top categories

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Watch

Shaun Nichols and Iain Thomson

03 Oct 2008

6.49 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Podcast image

02 Oct 2008

14.35 MBComputing podcast - Next-generation broadband Britain; and we report from Gartner's IT security summit More...

Shaun Nichols and Iain Thomson

26 Sep 2008

3.43 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Poll

Google Android

Google Android

Are you intending to try out a Google Android mobile phone?

Previous poll results

Spotlight

HP iPaq 514

Rumours hint at HP iPhone rival

Vendor's iPaq line may gain touch model   More...

Ask.com

Ask.com bullish about the future

Search firm outlines plans for market share gains   More...

National Identity Fraud Prevention Week

Nine out of 10 firms put customer data at risk

National ID fraud event reveals lax corporate attitudes   More...

Virtualisation

Virtualisation set to drive SaaS adoption

Software-as-a-service delivery model was too costly before virtualisation   More...

Primary Navigation