The importance of assessing the full impact of installing a wind turbine on
your site before announcing plans to do so was hammered home to London's Olympic
Delivery Agency (ODA) last week after it was forced to admit it may have to turn
the turbine off during the games to avoid distracting the athletes.
Speaking at the unveiling of plans for the 120 metre tall turbine late last
year, ODA chief executive David Higgins said the turbine would serve as a "
green beacon for the capital" and provide "a symbol of the sustainability
principles behind the Games".
But according to reports from New Civil Engineer magazine, embarrassed
organisers have now had to admit that the £2m turbine may have to be turned off
during events because the turbine will cause light to flicker, potentially
distracting the athletes.
Simon Wright, infrastructure director at the ODA, told the magazine that it
was looking at ways of minimising the effect, but may have to turn off the
turbine at certain times.
The move is likely to be seized on by critics of the games as another example
of poor planning from the ODA and it also provides a salutary lesson on the
importance of carrying out full impact assessments before publicly unveiling
plans for wind turbines.
However, the ODA is standing by the plans, claiming the turbine will produce
enough energy for 1,200 homes a year over its 20 year lifespan and will only be
turned off for short periods if at all.
It also claimed that while the turbine is a symbol of the games green
credentials its environmental efforts go far deeper and the bulk of the energy
required for the site will be generated using a combined cooling and heating
plant in the south of the park.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article