Ten US states have called on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to tighten up
the rules governing the sale of carbon offset credits, citing concerns over the
transparency and regulation of the credits.
The letter, sent from Californian Attorney General Edmund G Brown's office,
was a response to a call for comment from the FTC, which had solicited opinion
on the topic during its
2007 Carbon
Offset and Renewable Energy Workshop.
The states called for clarity in several areas, including a clear definition
of 'additionality' or how much new carbon lowering activity an offset credit
should support, and a standard way to measure baseline carbon emissions and
reductions from offset projects.
The letter also voiced concerns that carbon offsets could be sold more than
once, and also called for a decision on whether renewable energy credits –
certificates for energy produced using renewable resources – could be counted as
carbon offset credits. "Some regard offsets as limited to actions that directly
reduce emissions from an existing practice (e.g., capturing emissions from an
existing landfill)," said the letter.
California, Vermont, Arkansas, Delaware, Maine, Mississippi, Oklahoma,
Illinois, Connecticut and New Hampshire all endorsed the letter, which
recommended research into consumer perceptions, and into the best ways to
communicate the facts about carbon offsets.
The carbon trading market in the US operates on a voluntary basis today, said
Tiffany McCormick Potter, senior analyst at
Point Carbon, which advises on
greenhouse gas trading markets. She explained that the voluntary market is very
influenced by the standards used under the UN's compliance-based
clean development mechanism, but
currently lacks formal enforcement and auditing mechanisms to check on carbon
reduction claims.
The letter further cranks up pressure on the FTC to set out clear best
practice guidelines for US carbon offsets. The Commission recently began work on
updating its so-called green guides, which outline the rules governing how firms
market environmental initiatives to customers, and it is expected that
guidelines for the emerging offsetting industry will be included in the new
versions of these guides.
Meanwhile, separate US carbon trading and offsetting regimes are fast
emerging. A multi-state cap and trade programme called the
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative has
already created criteria which will form the basis for regulating carbon offset
requirements across North East and Mid-Atlantic States, while Midwestern states
are also planning a similar cap-and-trade scheme.
Additionally, the UK government is also working on finalising a
code
of best practice for carbon offsets that it hopes will become a gold
standard for credible offset projects and providers.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article