Capitol Building

Report claims EPA leans on scientists to deliver weaker regulations

US Environmental Protection Agency accused of placing political pressure on scientists to water down green legislation

Written by James Murray

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is guilty of consistently distorting science for political reasons and pressuring its staff scientists to water down the green regulations and guidelines they are working on.

That is the conclusion of a major investigation from the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), which found that of nearly 1,600 staff scientists over half claim to have experienced political interference in their work in the past five years.

Advertisement

Furthermore, almost a third of respondents claimed to have personally experienced frequent or occasional "statements by EPA officials that misrepresent scientists' findings", while 31 per cent felt they could not speak candidly within the agency.

Francesca Grifo, director of UCS's Scientific Integrity Program, said the investigation revealed "an agency in crisis" and warned that "distorting science to accommodate a narrow political agenda" posed a serious threat to the environment.

The report also found that political interference is most pronounced in offices where scientists are involved in writing regulations and at the National Center for Environmental Assessment, where many of the risk assessments that shape future legislation are undertaken.

"The investigation shows researchers are generally continuing to do their work," said Dr Grifo. "But their scientific findings are tossed aside when it is time to write regulations."

Moreover, much of the interference was alleged to have come direct from the White House's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) with one respondent claiming that "OMB's power needs to be checked as time after time they weaken rulemakings and policy decisions to favour industry."

The report will increase pressure on the EPA as the agency prepares to face a series of rulings over its failure to impose stringent enough environmental regulations.

Congress is investigating administration interference in a new chemical toxicity review process and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is expected to hold a hearing into political interference in the new EPA ground-level ozone pollution standard early next month.

Meanwhile, the EPA is also preparing to defend itself against legal action from California and 12 other states over its refusal to grant approval to the states' plans to impose their own car emissions standards.

Tags:

Further reading

Related articles

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Do you agree?

IT white papers

Search vnunet IThound

Top categories

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Watch

Shaun Nichols and Iain Thomson

03 Oct 2008

6.49 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Podcast image

02 Oct 2008

14.35 MBComputing podcast - Next-generation broadband Britain; and we report from Gartner's IT security summit More...

Shaun Nichols and Iain Thomson

26 Sep 2008

3.43 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Poll

Google Android

Google Android

Are you intending to try out a Google Android mobile phone?

Previous poll results

Spotlight

HP iPaq 514

Rumours hint at HP iPhone rival

Vendor's iPaq line may gain touch model   More...

Ask.com

Ask.com bullish about the future

Search firm outlines plans for market share gains   More...

National Identity Fraud Prevention Week

Nine out of 10 firms put customer data at risk

National ID fraud event reveals lax corporate attitudes   More...

Virtualisation

Virtualisation set to drive SaaS adoption

Software-as-a-service delivery model was too costly before virtualisation   More...

Primary Navigation