Computeractive readers have responded angrily after using our broadband speed
checker to discover they get significantly less speed than advertised by their
ISP.
Most said the results of their tests come as a shock. While many realised the
speeds quoted by their ISPs are a theoretical 'up to' maximum, they were
surprised at the size of the discrepancy.
Advertisement
David Godfrey, whose ISP is Sky, lives around half a mile from his local
exchange; in theory this means he should be getting very close to the speed he
is paying for, so he was less than impressed by the results our speed test
delivered.
He said: “The results were disappointing. I’m paying for up to 16Mbits/sec
but it showed I was only getting an average of 9Mbits/sec. I haven’t spoken to
Sky about this but I think it’s unfair.”
However, the tests show some more encouraging results. Mr J Halfhead who says
lives "very far from the exchange" is with ISP, Namesco.
“We are paying for 1Mbit/sec and the speed test showed we were getting
between this and 1.5Mbits/sec, which is pleasing considering we live out in the
sticks," he said.
“However, something needs to be done to help those not receiving sufficient
bandwidth and this falls down to Ofcom. ISPs will not regulate themselves.”
Some readers on our
forum have pointed
out that speed tests can vary. One forum poster, Penguin, said: "There is lots
of hysteria concerning speed test figures. These tests only show the results for
small packets of data, a more realistic measure of how your connection performs
is to download a large file and see how long it takes."
The Computeractive test downloads a 10MB file.
The fact remains that many readers find they are getting far less than they
bargained for with scant explanation given by their ISP as to why.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article