image: passport
Government plans to merge to agencies described as 'sinister'.

Government data plan is 'sinister ploy'

General Register Office and Identity and Passport Service to merge

Written by Andrea-Marie Vassou

The forthcoming merger of the General Register Office (GRO) and the Identity and Passport Service (IPS) has been called a "sinister ploy" by privacy experts.

Ross Anderson, professor of Security Engineering at the University of Cambridge, called the move to create another confidential database "pointless" with privacy group No2id describing it as a "blatant land-grab of personal identity".

Advertisement

The decision to merge the two agencies was announced in Chancellor Alistair Darling’s pre-budget report. It will mean the GRO, which oversees the registration of births, deaths and marriages, will be integrated into the Home Office-led IPS from April next year.

Because of an order made under section 38 of the Identity Cards Act in July, the organisations will also be able to share data. Parliament said this would be a good way to cross check information with ID card or passport applications.

However, Phil Booth National co-ordinator at No2ID, said the scheme was a "sinister ploy to collect information from the cradle to the grave".

He told Computeractive: "It’s worrying that a formerly independent agency should be integrated into an organisation whose main purpose is to collect the data of UK citizens.

“It is clearly a ploy to collect the data of under 18s, whose details cannot currently be collected under the passport or ID card schemes."

Anderson agreed. He told Computeractive: “We are moving towards a society where we will be monitored from birth to death."

When we contacted the GRO and IPS they said the merger had happened because the Office of National Statistics (ONS) will become independent of the Government on 1 April 2008.

A spokesman for the IPS said: “The GRO still remains as part of the Government and therefore had to be placed into the best suited department. However, it will remain a single unit within the IPS.”

But this did not appease Booth or Anderson who both described the reasoning behind the scheme as “bureaucratic".

“It’s another excuse for an addition to the fingerprinting database and the children’s database, Contactpoint,” said Booth.

Tags:

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Do you agree?

IT white papers

Search vnunet IThound

Top categories

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Watch

Shaun Nichols and Iain Thomson

03 Oct 2008

6.49 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Podcast image

02 Oct 2008

14.35 MBComputing podcast - Next-generation broadband Britain; and we report from Gartner's IT security summit More...

Shaun Nichols and Iain Thomson

26 Sep 2008

3.43 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Poll

Google Android

Google Android

Are you intending to try out a Google Android mobile phone?

Previous poll results

Spotlight

HP iPaq 514

Rumours hint at HP iPhone rival

Vendor's iPaq line may gain touch model   More...

Ask.com

Ask.com bullish about the future

Search firm outlines plans for market share gains   More...

National Identity Fraud Prevention Week

Nine out of 10 firms put customer data at risk

National ID fraud event reveals lax corporate attitudes   More...

Virtualisation

Virtualisation set to drive SaaS adoption

Software-as-a-service delivery model was too costly before virtualisation   More...

Primary Navigation