Outsourcing has a vital role but has become a victim of its own success.
Firms now risk costly mistakes by compulsively outsourcing functions without
thinking through the implications for management. A new approach is needed.
The attractions of outsourcing are clear. It is virtually impossible to find
a board of directors or government agency of any size that would deny that
outsourcing is a vital part of successful operations.
Investors certainly agree. Firms that announce plans for outsourcing
routinely see share price growth, and chief executives who outsource see their
bonuses increase. Economists say savings and efficiencies from outsourcing have
helped firms to control expenditure and maintain profitability despite cost
pressures since the 2001 downturn. When you look at the evidence, there is no
question, outsourcing has worked.
But this success is causing new challenges. High expectations are
increasingly hard to meet. As more functions are outsourced, integrating and
managing portfolios of service providers is becoming harder, and we are
beginning to see service disruptions due to an inability to govern highly
‘multisourced’ environments.
Some firms are outsourcing just because everyone else is doing it, without a
coherent plan or ability to manage a complex blend of internal and external
resources. Such chaotic and compulsive outsourcing makes it harder, rather than
easier, to respond to change. The right medicine used in the wrong way can make
us sicker.
There are several myths about outsourcing that are causing problems.
The myths of sourcing independence and service autonomy mean some managers
think of outsourcing as a discrete and autonomous procurement activity, as if
one sourcing decision or relationship has no bearing on another. But business
processes and technology services are usually interrelated. And outsourcing
often brings an infusion of technology and process innovation, creating an
environment where autonomous services simply do not exist.
Another myth is that outsourcing always delivers economies of scale – so
buyers demand cut-rate prices even for highly-customised services. The truth is
that service providers can only pass on cost savings if they can achieve
economies of scale through standardised offerings. If you want a
highly-customised solution you will pay premium prices in the future.
There is also the myth that outsourced services are ‘self-managing’. Buyers
believe that once they sign a deal, the outsourcer and the contract itself will
control the service. Most firms do not budget and plan adequately for the
management of the relationship and the services provided. New skills, new
processes and new metrics for performance management are necessary to ensure the
services deliver rapid results.
Another difficulty is that many buyers assume that, once signed, their
outsourcing contract remains set and that service-level agreements (SLAs),
pricing structure and service options cannot alter.
All contracts can be renegotiated. Unfortunately many outsourcing contracts
are inflexible. They are littered with terms and conditions that make it
difficult, time-consuming and expensive to alter them. But the fact that
business requirements change so quickly is one of the main reasons organisations
have turned to outsourcing.
Contracts must adopt new pricing models and SLA structures to anticipate and
accommodate change. They must be regularly reviewed, and they must be developed
to foster mutually beneficial results and relationships between the parties.
Finally, and perhaps most painfully, is the myth of sourcing competency. Many
firms believe they have the expertise to manage complex sourcing environments
even when they have never done it before. They learn too late that managing
external services requires vastly different skills than managing the same
services in-house.
Debunking these myths, and building a successful sourcing operation, requires
a new approach – multisourcing.
Multisourcing requires disciplined provisioning and blending of business and
IT services from an optimal set of internal and external providers in the
pursuit of business goals. Managers therefore need to develop a sourcing
strategy tightly linked to the overall business strategy and constantly
monitored by an effective company-wide governance system. If organisations are
to continue to realise the benefits of outsourcing they need new approaches to
sourcing strategy, governance, management, service provider selection and
service measurement.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article