The need for security will not go away

Security is now a strategic objective

Written by Phil Cracknell

Company management will always believe that security is a temporary problem which given time will subside.

They believe the risk will reduce or a 'silver bullet' is just around the corner.

Advertisement

They spend their thousands on security solutions hoping they will be the last, hoping that the security outlay will reduce as legislation matures and hackers are deterred by stiffer sentences.

There is even a hope that ISPs or some intermediary will police and govern activities on the Internet to prevent attacks and computer crime.

Let's face it, if we increased the custodial sentence for murder it would not stop people being killed each year.

Taking real-life crime as an example, we have plenty of prevention in place to guard against burglary, robbery, car theft, physical abuse etc. We also have a justice system that is designed to deliver punishment, and yet these crimes still take place.

Security is here to stay. And like real-life crime, unless you remove the targets and all motive and opportunity, it won't disappear.

Corporate mentality to security is as it is because computer-related crime is a relatively recent phenomena and the days when nothing was spent on information security are in living memory.

Securing an appropriate budget to protect your organisation can be a difficult task. Like insurance, it's hard to justify paying the premiums until such a time comes when you need to make a claim.

Businesses will have to continue to upgrade and evolve their defences to stay functional.

Risk assessments are still viewed internally in such a negative way, almost as if some evil force is trying to block the forward movement of the business. Security is to blame for the excessive time taken to change business process, infrastructure and systems development, but this is because security has yet to be absorbed into company culture.

I hear all the right noises, corporate statements and management saying, 'Security is everyone's problem' and, 'we take security very seriously', but I don't see a widespread change in the way security is viewed yet. The sudden international boom in security vendors and product offerings has caused some to view the industry cynically.

'Supply and Demand', I hear the vendors shout, but then they embark on a massive FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) campaign to increase awareness, fuelling corporate cynicism. On balance, vendors would not have to adopt such an approach if the corporate world were more responsive to the problems.

I've spread my share of FUD, that's what articles like this are, but we are in times of change and I hope the present time will be remembered for the period when businesses started to take security seriously.

I try to draw parity between other such requirements, like physical security or insurance and wonder if those areas had a similar battle to become accepted? I also tire of banging the drum and think 'Why bother?' But then an opportunity arises to show someone else the light and I take it!

The good news is that there are some businesses that are doing all that they should in terms of security, not many but more than a year ago, and so maybe the message is slowly getting through.

I just hope that these businesses and all future converts are onboard through their understanding of the issues and acceptance that security is a necessity, and not because they have suffered the impact of an incursion, seen the horrors first hand, lost downtime, lost money, lost respect and reputation, lost trust but managed to survive and quickly bolted the door!

I will end with a mesage to all corporate management and we will see where we are a year from now...

Businesses must invest in information security. This is not just a case of buying products, but real investment, education and process change.

They will have to keep spending on security, and their costs will probably increase because constant evolution of their corporate defences is required.

This will be the case as long as there is some change, be that to the threats, risks or nature and shape of their business.'

Phil Cracknell is chief technology officer of NetSurity

Tags:

Related articles

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Do you agree?

IT white papers

Search vnunet IThound

Top categories

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Watch

Shaun Nichols and Iain Thomson

10 Oct 2008

7.33 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Podcast image

09 Oct 2008

12.99 MBComputing podcast - IT implications of the banking crisis, and the FSA clamps down on IT security More...

Shaun Nichols and Iain Thomson

03 Oct 2008

6.49 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Poll

Google Android

Google Android

Are you intending to try out a Google Android mobile phone?

Previous poll results

Spotlight

MoD building

Latest data breach leads MPs to demand culture change

MoD admits to losing a hard drive containing up to...  More...

Online shopping

E-retailers urged to prepare for Christmas

Credit crunch sending shoppers online for cheaper presents   More...

Mobile phone

Emerging markets drive mobile growth

Mobile penetration rates expected to reach 95 per cent by...  More...

Digital information

Poor data classification costing companies dear

Millions wasted on searching through clutter, says analyst   More...

Primary Navigation