Frailty, thy name is outsourcing

Shall we insource, or shall we outsource?

Written by Computing

To outsource, or not to outsource: that is the question.

If Hamlet were to be reborn as an IT director, that is surely the topic he would be pondering today.

Advertisement

Perhaps Centrica could advise on the slings and arrows of outsourcing fortune, following its bringing back in-house of a major customer relationship management programme. But Kraft Foods may feel it had a sea of troubles and, by outsourcing, end them, after signing a $1.7bn (£930m) deal with EDS last week.

It is as easy to find predictions of the growth of outsourcing as it is to herald its demise. Both camps have plenty of material. In the past year Computing has reported on major firms such as Prudential and Sainsbury’s returning significant projects to their own control. We have written about just as many doing the opposite, such as Unilever, Schroders and Arcadia.

Certainly, the nature of external service provision is changing. Many companies are moving away from old-style mega-deals to a more selective approach, bringing in IT partners for specific functions and retaining others. This requires careful planning and skills in contract and programme management, but offers more flexibility.

The Millennium bug and the post-2000 boom led to a huge upswing in organisations outsourcing IT, claiming it was a ‘non-core’ activity. The rapid advances in technology since that time have placed IT firmly at the centre of transformational change and business strategy. To suggest now, when those original deals are up for renewal, that anything to do with IT is remotely ‘non-core’ is an extremely dubious approach to take.

But IT services remains the fastest growing area of the industry – just look at the spectacular financial results achieved by Indian providers.

Perhaps, then, it is nearing the time to consign the term outsourcing and its traditional connotations to history. Modern organisations will continue to make sensible use of external expertise to meet their objectives, but the idea of handing a function as vital as IT lock, stock and barrel to a third party is likely to decline.

Whatv do you think? Email us at feedback@computing.co.uk

Tags:

Further reading

Related articles

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Do you agree?

IT white papers

Search vnunet IThound

Top categories

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Watch

Shaun Nichols and Iain Thomson

03 Oct 2008

6.49 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Podcast image

02 Oct 2008

14.35 MBComputing podcast - Next-generation broadband Britain; and we report from Gartner's IT security summit More...

Shaun Nichols and Iain Thomson

26 Sep 2008

3.43 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Poll

Google Android

Google Android

Are you intending to try out a Google Android mobile phone?

Previous poll results

Spotlight

ISSE 2008

Sharing information key to cracking e-crime

Reluctance to report breaches only adding to the problem   More...

AMD logo

AMD expected to split into two

Separate entities to focus on chip design and manufacturing   More...

CA logo

CA pushes into virtualisation management space

Data Center Automation Manager looks after virtual and physical resources   More...

Hacking

Europeans charged in US hack attacks

British man facing 15 years in prison   More...

Primary Navigation