The Home Office’s national identity cards programme has come
in for considerable criticism since it was first proposed as a benefits
entitlement scheme in 2002.
Quite apart from the civil liberties issues, questions about
both the technology and the ability of the government to successfully deliver
IT-enabled projects have not been answered satisfactorily.
Many countries have ID cards, but the UK scheme, based on the
creation of a central identity register holding personal data and 13 biometrics
(face, two irises, 10 fingers) for the entire adult population, has no
precedent.
The plan has come under fire for its lack of clear purpose,
non-existent benefits for card holders, and technical inconsistencies.
At a journalists’ briefing at the Home Office (HO) last week,
the government sought to answer some of these criticisms.
An overwhelming lesson from past public sector IT disasters is
not to announce when the system will go live before talking to suppliers about
how it can be delivered. The plan to introduce the first cards by 2008 was
announced in 2003, at a time when the enabling legislation was expected to be
passed before last May’s General Election so the procurement could start in
June.
But the bill was held over because of the election, and will
now not be passed before the end of the year.
Katherine Courtney, director of the HO ID cards programme,
says things are still on track, despite the delay.
‘We had contingency built into the timetable and the
legislative delays gave us additional time to work through the specification and
continue to research the industry view,’ she said.
‘As long as the bill receives Royal Assent some time early in
the new year we will begin registering identities as planned towards the end of
2008.’
Both Courtney and head of egovernment Ian Watmore are keen to
stress that past experiences have not been wasted.
‘We are embedding best practice from the beginning – avoiding
a big bang, single-day implementation and spreading it over a long period so
lessons can be learned along the way,’ said Watmore.
‘So we will be able to change direction at a practical level
if we hit snags along the way.
‘We are also making sure the HO team is joined up with the
rest of the public sector,’ he said.
The scheme will use the infrastructure being put in place to
handle face-to-face interviews for passport registration. From 2008 the Passport
Service’s front office network will offer full biometric ID card registration
for the first few hundred thousand early adopters.
The gradual introduction of the scheme is crucial to its
success, says Watmore.
Since its inception the scheme has been decried as a solution
looking for a problem. At first the government said it was to help beat
terrorism, then fraud, then terrorism again. And there was little focus on the
real benefits to the citizen, an important point in
relation to overcoming civil liberties concerns, as well as the more practical
question of keeping the information on the central database up to date.
The Home Office has been working hard to develop potential
uses of the card, to give citizens sufficient incentive to keep their data
accurate.
When the first cards are issued in 2008
there will be few so-called ‘verification services’.
It will function as a valid travel document within the EU and
speed up Criminal Records Bureau checks (Computing, 15 September), but
most additional services will not be in place before 2010.
‘Verification services are something we expect to build up
incrementally,’ said Courtney.
‘Over the initial period, when few people are registered, we
will be piloting some services with closed user group trials.’
A private sector user group convened by the HO is also looking
at potential uses in the commercial sector.
Some of these will help the companies themselves, such as
speeding up hiring procedures or acting as door passes. Others will be good for
cardholders – minimising the documentation needed to make large-scale
withdrawals from bank accounts, or guaranteeing identity for online
purchasing.
To avoid a spiralling of identification requirements the
government is developing an accreditation scheme so that companies wanting to
make use of the card must justify the level of verification they require – from
PIN authentication to full biometric check.
‘We are building safeguards into the scheme so we are not
finding people checking biometrics for frivolous reasons,’ said Courtney.
The government is also working with banking industry body
Apacs to ensure the next generation of chip-and-PIN credit card readers can
provide PIN-authentication of ID cards. Once established, the same
infrastructure used to take a credit card payment can be used to identify the
customer for a high-risk transaction such as car hire.
One of the biggest technical challenges is the reliability of
biometric technology. Courtney acknowledges that biometrics do not perform
perfectly, but says the scheme does not suffer.
‘There are quite a few things in our testing strategy between
now and 2008, and one of the big challenges is around the scalability of
biometrics because the performance statistics are variable,’ said
Courtney.
‘But there is quite a lot of security even without the
biometric: the card itself will be secure and difficult to forge, as well as
being PIN-protected and associated with a public key infrastructure for online
purposes.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article