“It is clear from the NAO report that the setting of unrealistic deadlines
has been damaging to the national programme,” said Chaand Nagpaul, GP negotiator
with responsibility for IT in the BMA.
“Slipping deadlines for new IT systems and the premature release of systems
that are not fit for purpose has been deeply frustrating for NHS staff.”
Edward Leigh, chairman of the National Audit Office, said the fate of the
programme now depends entirely on improved clinical engagement.
“Commitment from NHS staff is central to the success of the programme,” he
said.
“Much more work needs to be done in convincing NHS staff of the benefits that
should arise from a fully functioning system.”
This should now become a major priority for Connecting for Health the
agency which runs the scheme according to Tim Burr, head of the NAO.
“There are serious delays in delivering the new care records systems, and the
priority now is to finish developing and deploying these systems,” he said.
Planned “go live” dates were missed for many of the first Trusts to take the
new systems.
Delays with iSOFT’s Lorenzo patient
software, now expected to be ready this summer and to be used in the North,
Midlands and East, are causing particular problems. There have also been issues
with
Cerner’s
Millenium software in the South.
In the interim, local service providers have upgraded legacy systems to plug
the gap.
The Department of Health apologised for the
delay, citing patient confidentiality concerns.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article