Although we're still waiting for the first DirectX 10 game to arrive, the
desire to futureproof is widespread, especially since games like
Crysis
look stunning.
Having launched high-end cards that retail for several hundred pounds in the
form of the GeForce 8800GTS and GTX,
Nvidia
is now catering for the mid and low end of the market.
Three new cards are the first to arrive: the 8500GT, 8600GT and best of the
bunch 8600GTS.
We've got an overclocked 8600GT in to test from
MSI
and, on the face of it; it looks like the perfect balance between
performance and cost.
Nvidia recommends a GPU clock speed of 540MHz, however MSI has overclocked
this to 580MHz.
Like the 8800 series, the 8600GT is one of the first graphics cards to use a
unified shader design, which means each pipeline is capable of performing
vertex, pixel, geometry or physics calculations instead of separate pipelines
for each task. This results in a more efficient design where resources are
allocated as needed.
MSI's 8600GT contains 32 stream processors, much lower than the 96 present in
the 8800GTS and 128 in the 8800GTX. Internal shader clock speed remains at
1.2GHz, the same as 8800GTS.
MSI has also overclocked the 256MB of DDR3 onboard graphics Ram. It runs at
800MHz (1.6GHz effective), 100MHz higher than Nvidia's 700MHz reference design.
On our benchmarking kit (an
Intel
Core 2 Extreme X6800, Asus P5W DH Deluxe
motherboard and 1GB Ram), performance was impressive in 3Dmark05, with a score
of 9,903, while the more demanding 3Dmark06 returned a very good 5,984.
The NX8600GT-T2D256E-OC is great for gaming at 1,200x1,024 resolutions and
below. Half-Life2, Far Cry, Doom3 and Fear, all remained playable and above
60fps (frames per second).
When we turned on 4x FSAA (anti-aliasing) and 4xAF
(anisotropic
filtering) at 1,200x1,024 scores wobbled a bit, although only two games
dropped below 60fps - Doom3 dropped to 48fps and Fear dropped to 37fps.
At resolutions above this game play wasn't particularly smooth, hovering
between 25fps and 55fps, and you'd be better off with something like a 320MB
8800GTS.
As you can see from our
benchmarking
website , at resolutions of 1,200x1,024 and above, 8800GTS cards
pushed out roughly double the frame rate of the 8600GT.
It's not as fast as the ATI Radeon X1950GT, and it's certainly no replacement
for an Nvidia GeForce 7800GTX or 7900GTX, but this card is superior to Nvidia's
GeForce 7600GT and ATI's X1650 range.
At £95 it sits in the same price category as low-end 7900GS cards. ATI's
Radeon X1950Pro only costs £5 more and performance wise we'd pick it out of the
whole bunch.
The back of the card is equipped with two dual link DVI-I outputs so the card
can power two 3,840x2,400 monitors at 30Hz, which is an excellent arrangement
for a sub-£100 card.
The GeForce 8600GT and 8500GT graphics processing units (GPUs) do not contain
HDCP keys as standard, however manufacturers can add chips to their cards to do
this.
Using a Sony BWU-100A Blu-ray drive and HDCP enabled display, we ascertained
that MSI's NX8600GT-T2D256E-OC is not HDCP enabled and the system failed to
playback a Blu-ray movie.
This means it's not ideal for playing back high definition content, although
by installing
AnyDVD
HD, the card will bypass ACSS encryption and we found the card was very capable
at outputting 1080p content through the DVI ports.
There's no need for an external power connector for the card, which many will
appreciate, and it's a quiet device. The card is also relatively short at only
17.7cm and is a breeze to plug in, especially after the hassle of 27cm 8800
cards.
It's certainly not an attractive card though, and modders with see-through
cases might be dissatisfied with the bland styling.
The performance of MSI's 8600GT is reasonable, especially when compared to
expensive GeForce 7600GT cards, while its compact size and DirectX 10
functionality add to its appeal.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article