Orange in phone mast row

The grounds on which planning permission for mobile phone masts can be refused will be at the centre of a planning permission battle this month.

Written by Lisa Kelly

Advertisement

The grounds on which planning permission for mobile phone masts can be refused will be at the centre of a planning permission battle this month.

Camden Council in North London will meet on 14 December to consider an application by phone giant Orange to erect 26 masts on the roof of the Royal Free Hospital in Hampstead.

At present council planning officers believe that they are not allowed to refuse a mast application on health grounds, but residents are being urged to dispute this by lawyer Alan Meyer.

In an exclusive interview with vnunet.com, Meyer said the problem is planning officers' ignorance of the law. They "are all extremely out of date", he said.

Meyer came to public attention after fighting a case on behalf of Mohamed Al Fayed against Tanbridge District Council in 1999 which went to the Court of Appeal, where it was found the "planning process was flawed".

The Court of Appeal stated that genuine public fear and concern is a material planning consideration, even if that fear is not based upon evidence. Since then he has helped 50 or 60 groups across the country in similar cases.

"The trouble is that planning officers are now working under planning permission guidelines issued in December 1992, when phones were analogue," said Meyer. "The object of the exercise then was to roll out the networks and to hell with everyone else. Now the situation has changed."

Meyer said the Court of Appeal's decision and the Human Rights Act, in the light of the Stewart Report, which looked into the safety of mobile phones, has effectively changed the rules surrounding planning permission.

In effect residents can now fight insensitive installations of masts when there are alternative sites. "Planning applications used to go through on the nod," said Meyer.

"The Stewart Report is not conclusive about health risks. Article six of the Act states people should get a fair public hearing and have their objections properly considered."

A spokesman for Camden Council said planning officers were checking the legal decisions. "The Human Rights Act may broaden the scope of what can be considered in a planning applications. The planning officers will be looking into the points he [Meyer] made," said the spokesman.

Orange was not available for comment.

A memorandum with updated legal advice can be obtained from solicitors Halsey Meyer Higgins.

Tags:

Related articles

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Do you agree?

Most commented stories

IT white papers

Search vnunet IThound

Top categories

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Watch

05 Sep 2008

8.64 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Podcast image

04 Sep 2008

12.7 MBComputing podcast 4 September 2008 More...

Podcast logo

02 Sep 2008

8.39 MBEco-Entrepreneur Podcast: Bulldog More...

Poll

INTERNET EXPLORER 8

INTERNET EXPLORER 8

Are you intending to download Internet Explorer 8 when it becomes available?

Previous poll results

Spotlight

LogMeIn Rescue+Mobile

BlackBerry gets LogMeIn remote support

Rescue+Mobile lets a support technician take control of the handset   More...

Dell manufacturing plant

Dell planning factory closures to cut costs

Report claims that PC maker is looking to sell off...  More...

Google Chrome

More growing pains for Chrome

Google wrestles with licensing and security problems   More...

Smartphone

US takes 3G crown from Europe

Americans finally catch up with Europeans in adoption of 3G   More...

Primary Navigation