Aluminium
tinfoil
hats used by the paranoid to shield their thoughts from shadowy government
agents in black helicopters may be making the problem worse rather than better,
according to research carried out at the
Massachusetts Institute of
Technology (MIT).
A team of four students used a $250,000 network analyser and have published a
short
paper showing that, rather than protecting the user, tinfoil hats actually
amplify the signals presumed by some to be used for mind control.
"It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the current
helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the government, possibly with
the involvement of the Federal
Communications Commission," wrote the authors of the paper entitled On
the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets: An Empirical Study.
"We hope this report will encourage the paranoid community to develop
improved helmet designs to avoid falling prey to these shortcomings."
The team tested three basic designs: the 'classic' all over skull cap; the
'fez' conical design; and the 'centurion' which has a foil peak. All three hats
were double layered with tinfoil.
Measurements were taken from four parts of the brain and revealed that the
signals received were increased, and in some cases doubled, by wearing the hats.
Similarly, the hats amplified the signals sent from the head, from an implanted
microchip or hidden bug.
The four authors of the paper, Ali Rahimi, Ben Recht, Jason Taylor and Noah
Vawte, are all students at MIT's
Electrical Engineering and
Computer Science department or its
Media Laboratory.
However, the study has drawn criticism from the 'tinfoil hat community'. "
Should paranoids trust people working for an organisation deeply involved in the
military-industrial complex?" asked Lyle Zapato, who runs a
website
dedicated to such phenomenon as mind control.
"While Rahimi, the lead investigator on whose site the paper is hosted, is
from MIT's Electrical Engineering and Computer Science department, the others
are from MIT's notorious Media Lab.
"Media Lab receives funding from
Darpa, which is one of those
government agencies they pretend to be concerned about. When it comes to mind
control, they are hardly an unbiased party."
Zapato goes on to point out a number of other inconsistencies in the report,
such as the fact that the study claims to have been conducted with Reynold's
aluminium foil despite a roll of Chef's Pride foil being clearly visible in one
of the pictures.
He also suggests that the very expensive test equipment used by the team is a
"subtle way of discouraging people from replicating the experiment at home".
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article