The global outsourcing market is undergoing "fundamental changes" including a
dramatic shift to more business process outsourcing (BPO), an increase in the
number of players, and a reduction in total deal value.
According to a newly published
IDC study of the top 100
outsourcing deals in 2004, these upheavals are being caused by increased
competition and expansion in the marketplace.
As a result, pressure is mounting on traditional outsourcers to alter their
business models in order successfully to compete in the coming years.
The value of the top 100 outsourcing deals in 2004 decreased by 1.2 per cent
from $69.1bn in 2003 to $68.3bn in 2004. However, qualifying for the top 100 in
2004 required a minimum deal value of $184m, a 5.1 per cent increase from 2003.
The study also found that the share of BPO and processing services deals in
the top 100 outsourcing deals increased from 15.2 per cent in 2003 to 25 per
cent in 2004, while the share of IT outsourcing services suffered a decline to
75 per cent of the 2004 market.
"The world of deal making for large outsourcing contracts in 2004 saw a
slight decline in signings by total value, a reduced number of mega-deals valued
at $1bn and higher, an increase in the number of players competing in this
segment, and a shift to more BPO deals as part of the mix," said David Tapper,
director of IT outsourcing, utility and offshore services research at IDC.
"These shifts, along with other key trends in the market such as the need to
lower costs and increase productivity, are creating fundamental changes in the
outsourcing marketplace.
"In order to compete, players need to radically alter their business models
to include newer service capabilities, involve different ecosystems of
partnerships, target 'non IT' opportunities, and seek new customers in the SMB
and consumer spaces as well as emerging markets."
The IDC study found that the number of players participating in the top 100
deals increased from 26 in 2003 to 34 in 2004.
While just three players captured 55.6 per cent of the contract value for the
top 100 deals in 2003, seven were needed to reach roughly the same amount (55.9
per cent) in 2004. IBM led the
way followed by CSC,
EDS,
Atos Origin,
HP,
Accenture and
Fujitsu.
Geographically, the value of deals captured by Asia/Pacific-based contracts,
although still small, showed a jump from 0.7 per cent of total deal value in
2003 to 3.9 per cent in 2004.
EMEA-based players, as determined by headquarters, increased their take of
these deals from 21.7 per cent in 2003 to 38.9 per cent in 2004, while US
vendors saw a decrease from 76.7 per cent to 56.3 per cent during this same
period.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article