A host of problems is keeping biometric security from becoming a mainstream
application, a panel of experts at this year's RSA Conference concluded.
"The largest complaint at biometrics conferences is that every year people
say that this is the year of biometrics. And then they come back the next year
and say maybe this is the year of biometrics," said Richard Lazarick, chief
technologist at CSC Global Security Solutions.
Lazarick argued that one of the major problems preventing biometrics from
becoming mainstream is a lack of agreed standards.
This prevents organisations using equipment from several vendors in creating
interoperable networks such as airports using a single database with iris scan
information.
Biometric security uses unique body features for identification or
authorisation and could replace smartcards and passwords. Common applications
base authentication on fingerprints, iris, face and voice and vein scans.
The panel conceded that fingerprint scanners are readily available and that
many notebook makers offer such technology as an option with business models.
However, it was argued that availability of hardware was not enough to
guarantee adoption of biometrics.
"Just because you have the hardware doesn't mean that each person who uses it
will use it in such a way that you get value for the organisation," warned Samir
Nanavati, a partner with International Biometric Group (IBG), an independent
consultancy.
"You might be seeing a false sense of hardware prevalence in the market space
now."
Biometrics are often painted as bullet-proof security, as the technology is
hard to forge because it provides authentication based on unique physical
characteristics.
But this is something of a myth, according to the panel, as many low-end
fingerprint scanners can easily be spoofed using a photocopy of the print or by
using Play-Doh clay or specially crafted rubber overlays.
Research by IBG showed that some devices will wrongly identify the
fingerprint in as many as 20 per cent of cases. The test was conducted by
exchanging the index finger for a different finger.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article