UK-based anti-spam organisation
Spamhaus
expressed concern yesterday that email inboxes around the world could be deluged
with unsolicited email if a US court rules against the group.
Email marketing company
E360Insight
won a US Federal Court order last month requesting Spamhaus to pay $11.7m in
damages for improperly listing the company on its blacklist. E360Insight has
also demanded to be removed from the blacklist.
Spamhaus chose to ignore the ruling on the basis that it is a UK-based
non-profit organisation with no offices or employees in the US, and is therefore
outside the jurisdiction of the US.
The organisation is concerned at how far the US court will go while it
appeals the ruling. Its greatest fear is that the judge will ask the
Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann) to suspend the
spamhaus.org domain.
The anti-spam group maintains that this cannot actually happen owing to the
effect the shutting down of the domain would have on the internet.
Spamhaus claims to monitor 650 million mailboxes and blocks around 50 billion
spam messages per day.
"The effect of suddenly not blocking such a large amount of spam would allow
this volume of unwanted junk to hit mail server queues all over the world," the
organisation said.
"We believe that a government agency would have to step in before that
happened."
But the group is also hopeful that Icann will fight the order. "We are sure
that Icann understands the technical effect as well as the political one," it
said.
Icann, which claims to be an independent authority, has drawn some fire of
late for its
close
relationship with the US government.
Spamhaus is also seeking legal counsel. "To ensure that this does not happen
we are working with lawyers to find a way to appeal/contest the ruling and stop
further nonsense by this spammer," the organisation said.
But should the worst happen, Spamhaus, which is operated entirely by
volunteers, hinted that it could give up the ghost rather than face more legal
issues with a workaround.
It has been suggested that the anti-spam operation could either switch to a
new domain name and transfer its customer base, or even operate using just the
IP address. But the company has written off both options.
"The reality is that if Spamhaus gets around the court order by switching
domain, the judge would very likely rule us in criminal contempt," the
organisation said.
"We do not want a criminal record for the sake of fighting spam. We normally
help fit the spammers with criminal records, not the other way round."
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article