Google
has responded to accusations of "airbrushing history" in its use of
controversial images of New Orleans which showed no signs of the devastation
caused by
Hurricane
Katrina.
The conflict stems from Google's decision to replace images or areas ravaged
by Hurricane Katrina with photos taken before the 2005 storm.
Google
Maps director John Hanke said in a written statement that the move was an
effort to improve the quality of Google Maps, and not an attempt to erase the
evidence of Hurricane Katrina.
"In September 2006, the storm imagery was replaced with pre-Katrina aerial
photography of much higher resolution as part of a regular series of global data
enhancements," said Hanke.
To rectify the situation, Google said that it had speeded up the processing
of newer high-resolution images that correctly display storm damage.
The images now show the effects of the storm, which killed 1,826 people and
caused more than $81bn in damage.
Hanke stopped short of issuing an apology, and pointed out that the
pre-Katrina images had been in use for more than six months.
"Make no mistake, this was not any effort on our part to rewrite history,"
he said.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article