The public sector should plan more carefully how it disposes of its growing
volume of personal computers and associated equipment, according to a report out
today by the
National Audit
Office (NAO).
The NAO has discovered that on average, public bodies replace their IT
equipment every five years, but research suggests it is more cost effective to
replace equipment at around three years, as this results in reduced operating
costs and increased resale value of the equipment.
Advertisement
"Government has so far not given enough thought to how it disposes of its
computers and related equipment. Growing concerns about the environment and the
increasing volumes of equipment mean this issue is becoming more important,"
said the head of the NAO Sir John Bourn.
"Government needs to understand better the trade-offs between securing better
immediate financial value and the wider environmental costs and benefits
associated with the disposal of ICT equipment. It should then use this knowledge
to develop appropriate procurement and disposal strategies."
The report indicates that these public bodies would benefit greatly by
following best commercial practice and disposing of equipment at three years.
However the NAO says that further investigation is required to understand
more fully the costs and benefits involved in changing the way in which public
bodies manage their ICT equipment and identify the optimal time to refresh their
equipment.
The report concludes that the central government bodies should conduct a
joint analysis of how to make the most of their IT systems.
This should include looking into how departments and their staff use such
equipment to make sure they have the best tools for the job, and to see whether
more second hand and re-useable ICT equipment could be made available to other
sectors, such as schools, through discounted resale or charitable donation.
As a result the NAO recommends that a public body should be formed to oversee
the entire IT equipment disposal chain through regular audits and spot checks,
enabling government to be sure that all third parties are acting legally,
responsibly and ethically.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article