A lack of investment in end-user application security has left users open to
attack, according to a group of security experts.
"End-points are a data repository and they need to be protected. It is an
area of underinvestment today," said Richard Reiner, chief security and
technology officer at
Assurent
Secure Intelligence.
Speaking at last week's NetEvents symposium in Barcelona, Reiner warned that
this is more important today, as end-points are becoming a primary focus of
attack.
"Just under 50 per cent of the security holes that are exploited are on the
end-point," he said.
"And they are in software products that you would not think could be
attacked, like web browsers and word processors."
Joshua Corman, principal security strategist at
IBM, suggested
that the danger had increased because attacks are no longer purely ego driven
and are motivated by "profit, politics and prestige".
Corman pointed to the
Storm worm
as an example of today's profit-motivated attacks.
"Storm is enjoying tremendous financial success because it uses malicious
code activity on end-points as a source of revenue generation to send spam," he
said. "They are making millions and millions of dollars every day."
Reiner added that the problem today is not so much network services, as these
had lower rates of vulnerability.
"A lot of the low-hanging fruit has been picked off by the black hats out
there," he said.
"There are a much larger number of desktop products than server products.
They do not tend to have been reviewed well from a security perspective, and
they tend to have a much higher relative rate of vulnerability."
Reiner called for a change in security investment spending. "The end-point is
not nearly so well protected today as it ought to be, given the actual
distribution of risk," he said.
However, Corman maintained that the weak point is still the end user. "The
success of Storm, for example, is a renaissance of social engineering and the
one thing you cannot patch in is people," he said.
"There is no vulnerability whatsoever, but they are getting someone to
download something and run it and taking advantage of the machine."
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article