Quantum cryptography, the most secure method of transmitting data, has taken
a step closer to mainstream viability with a technique that simplifies the
distribution of keys.
Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology claim that
the new "quantum key distribution" method minimises the required number of
detectors, the most costly components in quantum cryptography.
In quantum cryptography, a recipient needs to measure a sequence of photons,
or particles of light, transmitted by a sender.
These photons have information encoded in their polarisation, or direction of
their electric field.
In the most common polarisation-based protocol, known as BB84, the recipient
uses four single-photon detectors, costing approximately $5,000-$20,000 each.
One pair of detectors records photons with horizontal and vertical
polarisation, which could indicate zero and one respectively.
The other pair detects photons with 'diagonal', or +/- 45 degree,
polarisation in which the 'northeast' and 'northwest' directions alternatively
denote zero and one.
In the new method, the researchers, led Xiao Tang, designed an optical
component to make the diagonally polarised photons rotate by a further 45
degrees and arrive at the same detector.
However, the photons arrive later, and into a separate "time bin", than the
horizontal/vertical polarised ones.
Therefore, one pair of detectors can be used to record information from both
kinds of polarised photons in succession, reducing the required number of
detectors from four to two.
The boffins concede that their minimum-detector arrangement cuts transmission
rates by half, but point out that the system still works at broadband speeds.
This would allow real-time quantum encryption and decryption of
webcam-quality video streams over an experimental quantum network, for example.
In another protocol, called BB92, the researchers reduced the required number
of detectors from two to one.
And in later work, the researchers further developed their approach so that
the popular BB84 method now only requires one detector instead of four.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article